Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5300M vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1250MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5300M +325%
3.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2014
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
940 MHz
1250 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
100.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
6.400 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
3.200 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Topaz
Navi 14 PRO XLM
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy