Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

AMD Radeon Pro W5700X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 205W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700X +4478%
10.44 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2019
Release Date
Feb 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
2560
Shading Units
96
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
326.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
20.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
652.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

205W
TDP
143W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
90 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy