Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro S10000

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro S10000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2040MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 +8%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Zaphod
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy