AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

VS

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages

Released 9 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2040MHz vs 950MHz)

Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages

More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon PRO W6300

3.133 TFLOPS

FirePro S10000 Passive +8%

3.405 TFLOPS

Radeon PRO W6300

VS

FirePro S10000 Passive

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Nov 2012

Radeon Pro Navi

Generation

FirePro

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz

Base Clock

825 MHz

2040 MHz

Boost Clock

950 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1250 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

3GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

32bit

Memory Bus

384bit

64.00GB/s

Bandwidth

240.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

12

Compute Units

28

768

Shading Units

1792

48

TMUs

112

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

12

RT Cores

-

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

768 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

30.40 GPixel/s

97.92 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

106.4 GTexel/s

6.267 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

3.133 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

3.405 TFLOPS

195.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

Tahiti

Navi 24

GPU Variant

Tahiti PRO GL

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

28 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

4.313 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

352 mm²

Board Design

25W

TDP

375W

200 W

Suggested PSU

750 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

None

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

1.2

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

-

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

2

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

3

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

4

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs Intel Arc A580

5

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

6

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

7

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

8

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA A2

9

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA T1000

10

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower