Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (2040MHz vs 1219MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +151%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2017
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
8
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Lexa
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy