CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
+58%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 260 OEM
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
VS
Radeon R9 260 OEM
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
Bonaire
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
3
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
4
AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
5
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
6
NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
7
Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300
8
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
9
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
10
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy