Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X +30%
4.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy