Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (2040MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +86%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2016
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy