Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M265X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 226% (2040MHz vs 625MHz)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M +291%
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M265X
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
575 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
625 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Venus
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Venus PRO (216-0846009)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy