Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
3.133 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +18%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Amethyst
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy