AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Lower TDP (50W vs 320W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 9% (2550MHz vs 2331MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

9472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +1358%

52.22 TFLOPS

Blender

Radeon Pro W6400

221

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +4077%

9232

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +1625%

138

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +1170%

254

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +757%

300

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Jan 2024

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

2295 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

2550 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1438 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6X

64bit

Memory Bus

256bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

736.3GB/s

Render Config

12

Compute Units

-

SM Count

80

768

Shading Units

10240

48

TMUs

320

32

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

320

12

RT Cores

80

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

64 MB

8 MB

L3 Cache

-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

285.6 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

816.0 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

52.22 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.22 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

816.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W

TDP

320W

250 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

AD103

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

AD103-400-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

5 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 2

2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 390

3

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

4

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

5

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2

6

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs Intel Arc A750

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU