AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2331MHz vs 1590MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400 +25%

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

2.849 TFLOPS

Blender

Radeon Pro W6400

221

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +149%

552

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +75%

14

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +45%

29

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 +25%

44

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Apr 2020

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

1410 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

1590 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

14

12

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

896

48

TMUs

56

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

12

RT Cores

-

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

50.88 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

89.04 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.699 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.849 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

TU117

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

TU117-300-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

75W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

2

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

4

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

5

AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

6

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 3550

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip