Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon R5 M320

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon R5 M320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R5 M320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 138% (2034MHz vs 855MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600M +1232%
7.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M320
0.547 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1224 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
2034 MHz
Boost Clock
855 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
5
66
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
264
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

130.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.840 GPixel/s
227.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.10 GTexel/s
14.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
547.2 GFLOPS
455.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Jet
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy