CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon Pro W6800
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800
+11037%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800
VS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
60
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
64
240
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
4
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
7
AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
8
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400
9
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs ATI FirePro V8700
10
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy