Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 645 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 91.87GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (102W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +1893%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 645 OEM
0.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
957 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
91.87GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
3840
Shading Units
288
240
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
24
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.312 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.25 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
894.0 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
102W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GF114
-
-
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy