Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2320MHz vs 1762MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +558%
17.82 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon Pro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
727 MHz
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
60
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
60
RT Cores
6
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy