Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs Intel Arc A350

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (2150MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +616%
22.02 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
768
320
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
80
RT Cores
6
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
DG2-128
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
25W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy