Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireGL V7600

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs ATI FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +5634%
22.02 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
320
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
127W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
R600
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
R600 GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy