Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +911%
22.02 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
20
5120
Shading Units
1280
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy