Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA T400

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2150MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +1912%
22.02 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
5120
Shading Units
384
320
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
TU117
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy