Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 430 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +8085%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 OEM
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
96
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
49W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GF108
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy