Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (2150MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +944%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
960
320
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
24
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GK106
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy