Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R9 380

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R9 380

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +533%
22.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 380
3.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
1792
320
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.04 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.476 TFLOPS
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.476 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
190W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Antigua
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy