Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +37993%
12.19 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
RV620
Navi 33
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy