Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1700MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 172.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7500 +197%
12.19 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1344 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
190.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
24.37 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.19 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
380.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 33
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy