Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +144%
19.99 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
Fiji
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy