Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2600MHz vs 1837MHz)
Lower TDP (190W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700
31.95 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +94%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
132
48
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
16896
192
TMUs
528
96
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
GB100
Navi 32
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
208 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

190W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy