Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 32
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy