Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +3095%
31.95 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 32
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy