Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +7580%
31.95 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
135W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
G92
Navi 32
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy