Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +8155%
31.95 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
G92B
Navi 32
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy