CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
VS
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
NVIDIA GRID K160Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7800
+13636%
44.78 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800
VS
GRID K160Q
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2499 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
70
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
192
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
70
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
319.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
699.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
89.56 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.78 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
1399 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GK107
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Board Design
260W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
2
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
3
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA GRID M40
4
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
5
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
8
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
9
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
10
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy