Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +26560%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Mar 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
6144
Shading Units
96
384
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
24
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

295W
TDP
134W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G80
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy