CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireGL V8600
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireGL V8600
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
+183%
1.248 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
VS
FireGL V8600
Graphics Card
Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
4
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
R600
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Board Design
35W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
2
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
3
AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
4
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
5
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
6
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
7
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
8
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
9
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 OEM
10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy