Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +183%
1.248 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
4
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
R600
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy