Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jan 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV516
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy