Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
VSA-101
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy