Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1550MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +90%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2020
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
DG1
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
103 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy