Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1531MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
P106 090 +88%
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2017
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GP106
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy