Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1219MHz vs 780MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +108%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Oland
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy