Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)
AMD Radeon R7 350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +52%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350
0.819 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2016
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
819.2 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO MOCHA
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy