Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300 +14%
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2015
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Bonaire
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy