Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +5081%
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
RV620
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy