Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +64%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
20
640
Shading Units
1600
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Cypress
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy