Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +1827%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Nov 2023
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
48
640
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Navi 32
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy