Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 340 OEM and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 320GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 143W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 36.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340 OEM +162%
0.599 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
36.80GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
-
-
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
143W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
G80
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy