Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Boost +379%
3.315 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tahiti
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy