Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 176W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650 XT +1461%
10.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2055 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2635 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2190 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
280.3GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
168.6 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
337.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.59 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.79 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
674.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
176W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 23
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 23 KXT (215-130000136)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy