Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +9235%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
5376
24
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Navi 31
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy