Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs AMD FirePro M6000

AMD Radeon R5 A255 vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A255 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A255 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock940MHz
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A255
0.721 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000 +42%
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jul 2012
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
940 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
Heathrow
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy