Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

AMD Radeon R5 M255 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (940MHz vs 758MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M +182%
2.038 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
719 MHz
940 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1344
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.520 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
22.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
721.9 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
721.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
45.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Topaz
GPU Name
GK104
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy